King's Kung-Fu& Tai Chi

Zhuangzi Tsê Yang

則陽

則陽遊於楚,夷節言之於王,王未之見,夷節歸。彭陽見王果,曰:「夫子何不談我於王?」王果曰:「我不若公閱休。」彭陽曰:「公閱休,奚爲者邪?」曰:「冬則擉鼈于江,夏則休乎山樊。有過而問者,曰:『此予宅也。』夫夷節已不能,而況我乎?吾又不若夷節。夫夷節之爲人也,无德而有知,不自許,以之神其交,固顚冥乎富貴之地,非相助以德,相助消也。夫凍者假衣於春,暍者反冬乎冷風。夫楚王之爲人也,形尊而嚴,其於罪也,无赦如虎,非夫佞人、正德,其孰能橈焉?故聖人,其窮也,使家人忘其貧;其達也,使王公忘(其)爵祿而化卑;其於物也,與之爲娛矣;其於人也,樂物之通,而保己焉;故或不言而飲人以和,與人並立而使人化;父子之宜,彼其乎歸居,而一閒其所施。其於人心者,若是其遠也,故曰『待公閱休』。」

聖人達綢繆,周盡一體矣,而不知其然,性也。復命搖作,而以天爲師,人則從而命之也。憂乎知,而所行恆无幾時,其有止也,若之何?生而美者,人與之鑑,不告則不知其美於人也;若知之,若不知之,若聞之,若不聞之,其可喜也終无已,人之好之亦无已,性也。聖人之愛人也,人與之名,不告則不知其愛人也;若知之,若不知之,若聞之,若不聞之,其愛人也終无已,人之安之亦无已,性也。舊國舊都,望之暢然。雖使丘陵草木之緡,入之者十九,猶之暢然,況見見聞聞者也,以十仞之臺縣衆閒者也!冉相氏得其環中以隨成,與物无終无始,无幾无時。日與物化者,一不化者也,闔嘗舍之?夫師天而不得師天,與物皆殉,其以爲事也,若之何?夫聖人,未始有天,未始有人,未始有始,未始有物,與世偕行而不替,所行之備而不洫,其合之也,若之何?湯得其司御,門尹登恆,爲之傅之,從師而不囿,得其隨成,爲之司其名。之名、嬴法,得其兩見,仲尼之盡慮,爲之傅之。容成氏曰:「除日无歲,无內无外。」

魏瑩與田侯牟約,田侯牟背之,魏瑩怒,將使人刺之。犀首聞而恥之,曰:「君爲萬乘之君也,而以匹夫從讎。衍請受甲二十萬,爲君攻之,虜其人民,係其牛馬,使其君內熱發於背,然後拔其國,忌也出走,然後抶其背,折其脊。」季子聞而恥之,曰:「築十仞之城,城者旣十仞矣,則又壞之,此胥靡之所苦也。今兵不起七年矣,此王之基也。衍,亂人,不可聽也。」華子聞而醜之,曰:「善言伐齊者,亂人也。善言勿伐者,亦亂人也。謂『伐之與不伐,亂人也』者,又亂人也。」君曰:「然則若何?」曰:「君求其道而已矣。」惠子聞之,而見戴晉人。戴晉人曰:「有所謂蝸者,君知之乎?」曰:「然。」「有國於蝸之左角者曰觸氏,有國於蝸之右角者曰蠻氏,時相與爭地而戰,伏尸數萬,逐北,旬有五日而後反。」君曰:「噫,其虛言與?」曰:「臣請爲君實之。君以意在四方上下,有窮乎?」君曰:「无窮。」曰:「知遊心於无窮,而反在通達之國,若存若亡乎?」君曰:「然。」曰:「通達之中有魏,於魏中有梁,於梁中有王,王與蠻氏有辯乎?」君曰:「无辯。」客出,而君惝然若有亡也。客出,惠子見。君曰:「客,大人也,聖人不足以當之。」惠子曰:「夫吹管也,猶有嗃也。吹劒首者,吷而已矣。堯、舜,人之所譽也。道堯、舜於戴晉人之前,譬猶一吷也。」

孔子之楚,舍於蟻丘之漿。其鄰有夫妻臣妾登極者。子路曰:「是稯稯,何爲者邪?」仲尼曰:「是聖人僕也。是自埋於民,自藏於畔,其聲銷,其志无窮,其口雖言,其心未嘗言,方且與世違,而心不屑與之俱,是陸沈者也。是其市南宜僚邪?」子路請往召之。孔子曰:「已矣!彼知丘之著於己也,知丘之適楚也,以丘爲必使楚王之召己也,彼且以丘爲佞人也。夫若然者,其於佞人也,羞聞其言,而況親見其身乎?而何以爲存?」子路往視之,其室虛矣。

長梧封人問子牢曰:「君爲政焉,勿鹵莽;治民焉,勿滅裂。昔予爲禾,耕而鹵莽之,則其實亦鹵莽而報予;芸而滅裂之,其實亦滅裂而報予。予來年變齊,深其耕而熟耰之,(其禾繁以滋,)予終年厭飧。」莊子聞之,曰:「今人之治其形,理其心,多有似封人之所謂,遁其天,離其性,滅其情,亡其神,以衆爲故。鹵莽其性者,欲惡之孽,爲性萑葦蒹葭,始萌以扶吾形,尋擢吾性,並潰漏發,不擇所出,瘭疽、疥癕、內熱、溲膏是也。」

柏矩學於老聃,曰:「請之天下遊。」老聃曰:「已矣!天下猶是也。」又請之,老聃曰:「汝將何始?」曰:「始於齊。」至齊,見辜人焉,推而强之,解朝服而幕之,號天而哭之,曰:「子乎子乎!天下有大菑,子獨先離之!曰:『莫爲盜,莫爲殺人。榮辱立,然後覩所病。貨財聚,然後覩所爭。』今立人之所病,聚人之所爭,窮困人之身,使无休時,欲无至此,得乎?古之君人者,以得爲在民,以失爲在己,以正爲在民,以枉爲在己,故一形有失其形者,退而自責。今則不然,匿爲物而愚不識,大爲難而罪不敢,重爲任而罰不勝,遠其塗而誅不至。民知力竭,則以僞繼之,日出多僞,士民安取不僞?夫力不足則僞,知不足則欺,財不足則盜。盜竊之行,於誰責而可乎?」

蘧伯玉,行年六十,而六十化,未嘗不始於是之,而卒詘之以非也。未知今之所謂是之,非五十九非也?萬物有乎生,而莫見其根,有乎出,而莫見其門。人皆尊其知之所知,而莫知恃其知之所不知而後知,可不謂大疑乎?已乎已乎,且无所逃。此所謂然與,然乎?

仲尼問於太史大弢、伯常蹇、狶韋,曰:「夫衞靈公飲酒湛樂,不聽國家之政,田獵畢弋,不應諸侯之際,其所以爲靈公者,何邪?」大弢曰:「是因是也。」伯常蹇曰:「夫靈公有妻三人,同濫而浴。史鰌奉御而進所,搏幣而扶翼。其慢,若彼之甚也,見賢人,若此其肅也,是其所以爲靈公也。」狶韋曰:「夫靈公也,死,卜葬於故墓,不吉;卜葬於沙丘,而吉,掘之數仞,得石槨焉,洗而視之,有銘焉,曰:『不馮其子,靈公奪而埋之。』夫靈公之爲靈也,久矣。之二人,何足以識之?」

少知問於太公調曰:「何謂丘里之言?」太公調曰:「丘里者,合十姓百名,而以爲風俗也,合異以爲同,散同以爲異。今指馬之百體而不得馬,而馬係於前者,立其百體,而謂之馬也。是故丘山積卑而爲高,江河合水而爲大,大人合幷而爲公。是以自外入者,有主而不執;由中出者,有正而不距;四時殊氣,天不賜,故歲成;五官殊職,君不私,故國治;文武,大人不賜,故德備;萬物殊理,道不私,故无名,无名故无爲,无爲而无不爲。時有終始,世有變化,禍福淳淳;至有所拂者,而有所宜;自殉殊面,有所正者,有所差;比于大澤,百材皆度;觀乎大山,木石同壇。此之謂丘里之言。」

少知曰:「然則謂之道,足乎?」太公調曰:「不然。今計物之數,不止於萬,而期曰萬物者,以數之多者,號而讀之也。是故,天地者,形之大者也;陰陽者,氣之大者也;道者,爲之公。因其大,以號而讀之,則可也。已有之矣,乃將得比哉?則若以斯辯,譬猶狗馬,其不及,遠矣。」

少知曰:「四方之內,六合之裏,萬物之所生,惡起?」太公調曰:「陰陽相照,相蓋相治,四時相代,相生相殺,欲惡去就,於是橋起,雌雄片合,於是庸有;安危相易,禍福相生,緩急相摩,聚散以成。此名實之可紀,精之可志也。隨序之相理,橋運之相使,窮則反,終則始,此物之所有,言之所盡,知之所至,極物而已。覩道之人,不隨其所廢,不原其所起,此議之所止。」

少知曰:「季眞之『莫爲』,接子之『或使』,二家之議,孰正於其情,孰徧於其理?」太公調曰:「雞鳴狗吠,是人之所知。雖有大知,不能以言讀其所自化,又不能以意其所將爲。斯而析之,精至於无倫,大至於不可圍。或之使,莫之爲,未免於物,而終以爲過。或使則實,莫爲則虛。有名有實,是物之居;无名无實,在物之虛。可言可意,言而愈疏。未生不可忌,已死不可徂,死生非遠也,理不可覩。或之使,莫之爲,疑之所假。吾觀之本,其往无窮;吾求之末,其來无止。无窮、无止,言之无也,與物同理。或使、莫爲,言之本也,與物終始。道不可有,有不可无。道之爲名,所假而行。或使、莫爲,在物一曲,夫胡爲於大方?言而足,則終日言而盡道;言而不足,則終日言而盡物。道,物之極,言默不足以載。非言非默,議有所極。」

WHEN Tsê Yang visited the Ch'u State, I Chieh

An official of Ch'u.

spoke of him to the prince; but the latter refused an audience.

Upon I Chieh's return, Tsê Yang went to see Wang Kuo,

A local Sage.

and asked him to obtain an interview with the prince.

"I am not so fitted for that," replied Wang Kuo, "as Kung Yüeh Hsiu."

A hermit.

"What sort of a man is he?" enquired. Tsê Yang.

"In winter," said Wang Kuo, "he catches turtles on the river. In summer, he reposes in some mountain copse. If any passers-by ask of him, he tells them, "This is my home." Where I Chieh could not succeed, still less should I. I am not equal even to him.

"He is a man without virtue, but possessed of knowledge. Were it not for an air of arrogance, he would be very popular with his superiors. But help without virtue is a hindrance. Shivering people borrowing clothes in the coming spring! Hot people thinking of last winter's icy blast!

"The prince of Ch'u is dignified and severe. In punishing, he is merciless as a tiger. Only a very practised or a very perfect man could influence him.

"The true Sage, when in obscurity, causes those around him to forget their poverty. When in power, he causes princes to forget ranks and emoluments, and to become as though of low estate. He rejoices exceedingly in all creation. He exults to see Tao diffused among his fellow-men, while suffering no loss himself.

Tao is a constant quantity. It can be shared, but cannot be divided.

"Thus, although silent, he can instil peace; and by his mere presence cause men to be to each other as father and son. From his very return to passivity comes this active influence for good. So widely does he differ in heart from ordinary men. Wherefore I said, 'Wait for Kung Yüeh Hsiu.'

"The true Sage is free from all embarrassments. All things are to him as One. Yet he knows not that this is so. It is simply nature, In the midst of action he remains the same. He makes God his guide, and men make him theirs. He grieves that wisdom carries one but a short distance, and at times comes altogether to a deadlock.

"To a beauty, mankind is the mirror in which she sees herself. If no one tells her she is beautiful, she does not know that she is so. But whether she knows it or whether she does not know it, whether she hears it or whether she does not hear it, her joy will never cease, neither will mankind ever cease to take pleasure therein. It is nature.

"The love of a Sage for his fellows likewise finds expression among mankind. Were he not told so, he would not know that he loved his fellows. But whether he knows it or whether he does not know it, whether he hears it or whether he does not hear it, his love for his fellows is without end, and mankind cease not to repose therein.

"The old country, the old home, gladden a wanderer's eyes. Nay, though nine-tenths of it be a howling wilderness, still his eye will be glad. How much more to see sight and hear hearing, from a lofty dais suspended in their very midst!"

The joy of the wanderer is as that of the mind returning to a consciousness only of itself.

Jen Hsiang Shih reached the centre and attained.

The centre at which all Infinities converge. See p. 18. This individual was a legendary ruler of old.

He recognised no beginning, no end, no quantity, no time. Daily modified together with his environment, as part of One he knew no modification. Why not rest in this?

To strive to follow God and not to succeed is to display an activity fatal to itself. How can success ever be thus achieved?

The true Sage ignores God. He ignores man. He ignores a beginning. He ignores matter. He moves in harmony with his generation and suffers not. He takes things as they come and is not overwhelmed. How are we to become like him?

T'ang appointed his Equerry, Mên Yin Têng Hêng, to be his tutor, listening to his counsels but not being restricted by them. He got Tao for himself and a reputation for his tutor. But the reputation was a violation of principle, and landed him in the domain of alternatives.

Instead of One. No ingenuity of commentator has here succeeded in making sense.

As a tutor, Confucius pushed care and anxiety to an extreme limit.

Yung Ch'êng Shih

Lao Tzŭ's tutor.

said, "Take away days, and there would be no years. No inside, no outside."

Prince Hui of Wei had made a treaty with prince Wei of Ch'i, which the latter broke.

Thereupon prince Hui was wroth, and was about to send a man to assassinate him. But the Captain-General heard of this, and cried out in shame, "Sire, you are ruler over a mighty State, yet you would seek the vengeance of a common man. Give me two hundred thousand warriors, and I will do the work for you. I will take his people prisoners, and carry off their oxen and horses. I will make the heat of the prince's mind break out on his back. Then I will seize his country, and he will flee. Then you can wring his neck as you please."

When Chi Tzŭ heard this, he cried out in shame and said, "If you are building a ten-perch wall, and when the wall is near completion, destroy it, you inflict great hardship on the workmen.

Alluding to the corvée system of public works. The speaker was an official of Wei.

Now for seven years the troops have not been called out. That is, as it were, your Highness' foundation work. Listen not to the Captain-General. He is a mischievous fellow."

When Hua Tzŭ

Also an official of Wei.

heard this, he was very indignant and said, "He who argued in favour of punishing the Ch'i State was a mischievous fellow. And he who argued against punishing the Ch'i State was a mischievous fellow. And he who says that either of the above is a mischievous fellow, is a mischievous fellow himself."

"Where then shall I find what to do?" enquired the prince.

"In Tao alone," said Hua Tzŭ.

When Hui Tzŭ heard this, he introduced Tai Chin Jen to the prince.

A Sage of the Liang State. For Hui Tzŭ, see p. 8.

"There is a creature called a snail," said Tai Chin Jen. "Does your Highness know what I mean? "

"I do," replied the prince.

"There is a kingdom on its left horn," continued Tai Chin Jen, "ruled over by Aggression, and another on its right horn, ruled over by Violence. These two rulers are constantly fighting for territory. In such cases, corpses lie about by thousands, and one party will pursue the other for fifteen days before returning."

"Whew!" cried the prince. "Surely you are joking."

"Sire," replied Tai Chin Jen, "I beg you to regard it as fact. Does your Highness recognise any limit to space? "

"None," said the prince, "It is boundless."

"When, therefore," continued Tai Chin Jen, "the mind descends from the contemplation of boundless space to the contemplation of a kingdom with fixed boundaries, that kingdom must seem to be of dimensions infinitesimally small?"

"Of course," replied the prince.

"Well then," said Tai Chin Jen, "in a kingdom with fixed boundaries

Meaning the then empire of the Chous. there is the Wei State. In the Wei State there is the city of Liang. In the city of Liang there is a prince. In what does that prince differ from Violence?"

In his pettiness.

"There is no difference," said the prince.

Thereupon Tai Chin Jen took his leave, and the prince remained in a state of mental perturbation, as though he had lost something.

When Tai Chin Jen had gone, Hui Tzŭ presented himself, and the prince said, "Our friend is truly a great man. Sages are not his equal."

"If you blow through a tube," replied Hui Tzŭ, "the result will be a note. If you blow through the hole in a sword-hilt, the result will be simply whssh. Yao and Shun have been belauded by mankind; yet compared with Tai Chin Jen they are but whssh."

When Confucius went to Ch'u, he stopped at a restaurant on Mount I. The servant to a man and his wife who lived next door, got up on top of the house.

"Whatever is he doing up there?" asked Tzŭ Lu.

"He is a Sage," replied Confucius," under the garb of a menial. He buries himself among the people.

So as to get into closer relation with them.

He effaces himself at the wayside. Fame, he has none; but his perseverance is inexhaustible. Though his mouth speaks, his heart speaks not. He has turned his back upon mankind, not caring to abide amongst them. He has drowned himself on dry land. I think 'tis I Liao of Shih-nan."

See p. 325.

Tzŭ Lu asked to be allowed to go and call him; but Confucius stopped him, saying, "No. He knows that I know what he is. He knows that I have come to Ch'u to recommend him to the prince. And he looks on me as a toady. Under the circumstances, as he would scorn to hear the words of a toady, how much more would he scorn to see him in the flesh! How could you keep him?"

Tzŭ Lu went to see, but the house was empty.

The border-warden of Ch'ang-wu said to Tzŭ Lao,

Ch'in Lao, or Ch'in Chang, a disciple of Confucius.

"A prince in his administrative details must not lack thoroughness; in his executive details he must not be inefficient. Formerly, in my ploughing I lacked thoroughness, and the results also lacked thoroughness. In my weeding I was inefficient, and the results were also inefficient. By and by, I changed my system. I ploughed deep, and weeded carefully, the result being an excellent harvest, more than I could get through in a year."

Chuang Tzŭ, upon hearing this, observed, "The men of to-day in their self-regulation and their self-organisation are mostly as the Border-warden has described. They put their Godhead out of sight. They abandon their natural dispositions. They get rid of all feeling. They part with their souls, carried away by the fashion of the hour.

"Those who lack thoroughness in regard to their natural dispositions suffer an evil tribe to take the place thereof.

The physical senses.

These grow up rank as reeds and rushes, at first of apparent value to the body, but afterwards to destroy the natural disposition. Then they break out, at random, like sores and ulcers carrying off pent-up humours."

Poh Chü was studying under Lao Tzŭ. "Let us go," said he, "and wander over the world."

One commentator says Poh Chü was a "criminal," probably from his sympathetic remarks in the context.

"No," replied Lao Tzŭ, "the world is just as you see it here."

But as he again urged it, Lao Tzŭ said, "Where would you go to begin with?"

"I would begin," answered Poh Chü, "by going to the Ch'i State. There I would view the dead bodies of their malefactors. I would push them to make them rise. I would take off my robes and cover them. I would cry to God and bemoan their lot, as follows:—'O sirs, O sirs, there was trouble upon earth, and you were the first to fall into it!'

"I would say, 'Perhaps you were robbers, or perhaps murderers?' .... Honour and disgrace were set up, and evil followed. Wealth was accumulated, and contentions began. Now the evil which has been set up and the contentions which have accumulated, endlessly weary man's body and give him no rest. What escape is there from this?

This might almost have come from The Curse of Capital (Aveling) or from one of Mr. Hyndman's discourses.

"The rulers of old set off all success to the credit of their people, attributing all failure to themselves. All that was right went to the credit of their people, all that was wrong they attributed to themselves. Therefore, if any matter fell short of achievement, they turned and blamed themselves.

"Not so the rulers of to-day. They conceal a thing and blame those who cannot see it. They impose dangerous tasks and punish those who dare not undertake them. They inflict heavy burdens and chastise those who cannot bear them. They ordain long marches and slay those who cannot make them.

"And the people, feeling that their powers are inadequate, have recourse to fraud. For when there is so much fraud about,

In the rulers.

how can the people be otherwise than fraudulent? If their strength is insufficient, they will have recourse to fraud. If their knowledge is insufficient, they will have recourse to deceit. If their means are insufficient, they will steal. And for such robbery and theft, who is really responsible?"

When Chu Poh Yü

See p. 49.

reached his sixtieth year, he changed his opinions. What he had previously regarded as right, he now came to regard as wrong. But who shall say whether the right of to-day may not be as wrong as the wrong of the previous fifty-nine years?

See p. 365.

Things are produced around us, but no one knows the whence. They issue forth, but no one sees the portal. Men one and all value that part of knowledge which is known. They do not know how to avail themselves of the unknown in order to reach knowledge. Is not this misguided?

Men value the phenomena of which the senses make them conscious, but not the phenomena of the senses themselves.

Alas! alas! the impossibility of escaping from this state results in what is known as elective affinity.

Adaptation to the suitable; being as one is because more adapted to that than to something to which one is not adapted. See ch. ii, where this idea is first broached.

Confucius asked the historiographers Ta T'ao, Poh Chang Ch'ien, and Hsi Wei, saying, "Duke Ling was fond of wine and given up to pleasure, and neglected the administration of his State. He spent his time in hunting, and did not cultivate the goodwill of the other feudal princes. How was it he came to be called Ling?"

The name Ling means "knowing," which may be taken in two senses.

"For those very reasons," replied Ta T'ao.

"The Duke," said Poh Chang Ch'ien, "had three wives. He was having a bath together with them when Shih Ch'iu, summoned by his Highness, entered the apartment. Thereupon the Duke covered himself and the ladies. So outrageously did he behave on the one hand, and yet so respectful was he towards a virtuous man. Hence he was called Ling."

"When the Duke died," said Hsi Wei, "divination showed that it would be inauspicious to bury him in the old family burying-ground, but auspicious to bury him at Sha-ch'iu. And upon digging a grave there, several fathoms deep, a stone coffin was found, which, being cleaned, yielded the following inscription:—Posterity cannot be trusted. Duke Ling will seize this for his tomb.

"As a matter of fact, Duke Ling had been named Ling long before. What should these two persons know about it?"

As evidenced by the inscription, the Duke had been so named long before, in the Book of Fate.

Shao Chih asked T'ai Kung Tiao, saying, "What is meant by society?"

The first name signifies Small Knowledge. Of the second personage there is no record.

"Society," replied T'ai Kung Tiao, "is an agreement of a certain number of families and individuals to abide by certain customs. Discordant elements unite to form a harmonious whole. Take away this unity and each has a separate individuality.

"Point at any one of the many parts of a horse, and that is not a horse, although there is the horse before you. It is the combination of all which makes the horse.

"Similarly, a mountain is high because of its individual particles. A river is large because of its individual drops. And he is a just man who regards all parts from the point of view of the whole.

"Thus, in regard to the views of others, he holds his own opinion, but not obstinately. In regard to his own views, while conscious of their truth, he does not despise the opinions of others.

"The four seasons have different characteristics. but God shows no preference for either, and therefore we have the year complete.

With results which could not be otherwise achieved.

The functions of the various classes of officials differ; but the sovereign shows no partiality, and therefore the empire is governed. There are the civil and the military; but the truly great man shows no preference for either, and therefore their efficacy is complete. All things are under the operation of varying laws; but Tao shows no partiality and therefore it cannot be identified.

As the given part of anything.

Not being able to be identified, it consequently does nothing. And by doing nothing all things can be done.

"Seasons have their beginnings and their ends. Generations change and change. Good and evil fortune alternate, bringing sorrow here, happiness there.

Nunc mihi, nunc alio, benigna.

He who obstinately views things from his own standpoint only, may be right in one case and wrong in another. Just as in a great jungle all kinds of shrubs are found together; or as on a mountain you see trees and stones indiscriminately mixed,—so is what we call society."

"Would it not do then," asked Shao Chih, "if we were to call this Tao?"

"It would not," replied T'ai Kung Tiao. "All creation is made up of more than ten thousand things. We speak of creation as the Ten Thousand Things merely because it is a convenient term by which to express a large number. In point of outward shape the universe is vast. In point of influence the Positive and Negative principles are mighty. Yet Tao folds them all in its embrace. For convenience' sake the bond of society is called great. But how can that which is thus conditioned

By having a name.

be compared with Tao? There is as wide a difference between them as there is between a horse and a dog."

"Whence then," enquired Shao Chih, "comes the vitality of all things between the four points of the compass, between heaven above and earth beneath?"

"The Positive and Negative principles," answered T'ai Kung Tiao, "influence, act upon, and regulate each other. The four seasons alternate with, give birth to, and destroy one another. Hence, loves and hates, and courses rejected and courses adopted. Hence too, the intercourse of the sexes.

"States of peril and safety alternate. Good and evil fortune give birth to one another. Slowness and speed are mutually exclusive. Collection and dispersion are correlates. The actuality of these may be noted.

There is the name and the embodiment.

The essence of each can be verified. There is regular movement forward, modified by deflection into a curve. Exhaustion leads to renewal. The end introduces a new beginning. This is the law of material existences. The force of language, the reach of knowledge, cannot pass beyond the bounds of such material existences. The disciple of Tao refrains from prying into the states after or before. Human speculation stops short of this,"

"Chi Chên," said Shao Chih, "taught Chance; Chieh Tzŭ taught Predestination.

"Two Sages." Comm.

In the speculations of these two schools, on which side did right lie?"

"The cock crows," replied T'ai Kung Tiao, "and the dog barks. So much we know. But the wisest of us could not say why one crows and the other barks, nor guess why they crow or bark at all.

"Let me explain. The infinitely small is inappreciable; the infinitely great is immeasurable. Chance and Predestination must refer to the conditioned. Consequently, both are wrong.

"Predestination involves a real existence.

Of a God.

Chance implies an absolute absence of any principle. To have a name and the embodiment thereof,—this is to have a material existence. To have no name and no embodiment,—of this one can speak and think; but the more one speaks the farther off one gets.

"The unborn creature cannot be kept from life.

So powerful is its "will to live."

The dead cannot be tracked. From birth to death is but a span; yet the secret cannot be known. Chance and Predestination are but à priori solutions.

"When I seek for a beginning, I find only time infinite. When I look forward to an end, I see only time infinite. Infinity of time past and to come implies no beginning and is in accordance with the laws of material existences. Predestination and Chance give us a beginning, but one which is compatible only with the existence of matter.

And not with the time before matter was.

"Tao cannot be existent. If it were existent, it could not be non-existent. The very name of Tao is only adopted for convenience' sake. Predestination and Chance are limited to material existences. How can they bear upon the infinite?

"Were language adequate, it would take but a day to fully set forth Tao. Not being adequate, it takes that time to explain material existences. Tao is something beyond material existences. It cannot be conveyed either by words or by silence. In that state which is neither speech nor silence, its transcendental nature may be apprehended."

"With this essay in China," says Lin Hsi Chung, "what need to fetch Buddhist books from the West?"

English: Herbert A. Giles (1889), Chuang Tzŭ: Mystic, Moralist, and Social Reformer (1889) — public domain. Chinese: Guo Xiang recension from Chinese Wikisource.

Character glossary

Similar passages

Data: English Wikisource (Public domain texts; transcription CC BY-SA 4.0); Chinese Wikisource (Public domain texts; transcription CC BY-SA 4.0). Retrieved 2026-10-22.