King's Kung-Fu& Tai Chi

Zhuangzi Horses' Hoofs

馬蹄

馬,蹄可以踐霜雪,毛可以禦風寒,齕草飲水,翹足而陸,此馬之眞性也,雖有義臺路寢,无所用之。及至伯樂,曰:「我善治馬。」燒之剔之,刻之雒之,連之以羈馽,編之以皁棧,馬之死者十二三矣。飢之渴之,馳之驟之,整之齊之,前有橛飾之患,而後有鞭筴之威,而馬之死者已過半矣。陶者曰:「我善治埴,圓者中規,方者中矩。」匠人曰:「我善治木,曲者中鉤,直者應繩。」夫埴木之性,豈欲中規矩鉤繩哉?然且世世稱之曰:「伯樂善治馬,而陶匠善治埴木。」此亦治天下者之過也。

吾意善治天下者不然。彼民有常性,織而衣,耕而食,是謂同德;一而不黨,命曰天放。故至德之世,其行塡塡,其視顚顚。當是時也,山无蹊隧,澤无舟梁,萬物羣生,連屬其鄉,禽獸成羣,草木遂長,是故禽獸可係羈而遊,鳥鵲之巢可攀援而闚。夫至德之世,同與禽獸居,族與萬物並,惡乎知君子小人哉?同乎无知,其德不離,同乎无欲,是謂素樸,素樸而民性得矣。及至聖人,蹩躠爲仁,踶跂爲義,而天下始疑矣;澶漫爲樂,擿僻爲禮,而天下始分矣。故純樸不殘,孰爲犧樽?白玉不毀,孰爲珪璋?道德不廢,安取仁義?情性不離,安用禮樂?五色不亂,孰爲文采?五聲不亂,孰應六律?

夫殘樸以爲器,工匠之罪也;毀道德以爲仁義,聖人之過也。夫馬,陸居則食草飲水,喜則交頸相靡,怒則分背相踶,馬知已此矣。夫加之以衡枙,齊之以月題,而馬知介倪、闉枙、騺曼、詭銜、竊轡,故馬之知而能至盜者,伯樂之罪也。夫赫胥氏之時,民居不知所爲,行不知所之,含哺而熙,鼓腹而遊,民能以此矣。及至聖人屈折禮樂以匡天下之形,縣企仁義以慰天下之心,而民乃始踶跂好知,爭歸於利,不可止也,此亦聖人之過也。

HORSES have hoofs to carry them over frost and snow; hair, to protect them from wind and cold. They eat grass and drink water, and fling up their heels over the champaign. Such is the real nature of horses. Palatial dwellings are of no use to them.

One day Poh Loh

A Chinese Rarey, of somewhat legendary character.

appeared, saying, "I understand the management of horses."

So he branded them, and clipped them, and pared their hoofs, and put halters on them, tying them up by the head and shackling them by the feet, and disposing them in stables, with the result that two or three in every ten died. Then he kept them hungry and thirsty, trotting them and galloping them, and grooming, and trimming, with the misery of the tasselled bridle before and the fear of the knotted whip behind, until more than half of them were dead.

The potter says, "I can do what I will with clay. If I want it round, I use compasses; if rectangular, a square."

The carpenter says, "I can do what I will with wood. If I want it curved, I use an arc; if straight, a line."

But on what grounds can we think that the natures of clay and wood desire this application of compasses and square, of arc and line? Nevertheless, every age extols Poh Loh for his skill in managing horses, and potters and carpenters for their skill with clay and wood. Those who govern the empire make the same mistake.

Now I regard government of the empire from quite a different point of view.

The people have certain natural instincts;—to weave and clothe themselves, to till and feed themselves. These are common to all humanity, and all are agreed thereon. Such instincts are called "Heaven-sent."

And so in the days when natural instincts prevailed, men moved quietly and gazed steadily. At that time, there were no roads over mountains, nor boats, nor bridges over water. All things were produced, each for its own proper sphere. Birds and beasts multiplied; trees and shrubs grew up. The former might be led by the hand; you could climb up and peep into the raven's nest. For then man dwelt with birds and beasts, and all creation was one. There were no distinctions of good and bad men. Being all equally without knowledge, their virtue could not go astray. Being all equally without evil desires, they were in a state of natural integrity, the perfection of human existence.

But when Sages appeared, tripping people over charity and fettering with duty to one's neighbour, doubt found its way into the world. And then with their gushing over music and fussing over ceremony, the empire became divided against itself.

Music and ceremonies are important factors in the Confucian system of government.

Were the natural integrity of things left unharmed, who could make sacrificial vessels? Were white jade left unbroken, who could make the regalia of courts? Were Tao not abandoned, who could introduce charity and duty to one's neighbour? Were man's natural instincts his guide, what need would there be for music and ceremonies? Were the five colours not confused, who would practise decoration? Were the five notes not confused, who would adopt the six pitch-pipes?

See chs. viii and x.

Destruction of the natural integrity of things, in order to produce articles of various kinds,—this is the fault of the artisan. Annihilation of Tao in order to practise charity and duty to one's neighbour,—this is the error of the Sage.

Horses live on dry land, eat grass and drink water. When pleased, they rub their necks together. When angry, they turn round and kick up their heels at each other. Thus far only do their natural dispositions carry them. But bridled and bitted, with a plate of metal on their foreheads, they learn to cast vicious looks, to turn the head to bite, to resist, to get the bit out of the mouth or the bridle into it. And thus their natures become depraved,—the fault of Poh Loh.

In the days of Ho Hsü

A legendary ruler of old.

the people did nothing in particular when at rest, and went nowhere in particular when they moved. Having food, they rejoiced; having full bellies, they strolled about. Such were the capacities of the people. But when the Sages came to worry them with ceremonies and music in order to rectify the form of government, and dangled charity and duty to one's neighbour before them in order to satisfy their hearts,—then the people began to develop a taste for knowledge and to struggle one with the other in their desire for gain. This was the error of the Sages.

The simplicity of style, and general intelligibility of this chapter have raised doubts as to its genuineness. But as Lin Hsi Chung justly observes, its sympathetic tone in relation to dumb animals, stamps it, in spite of an undue proportion of word to thought, as beyond reach of the forger's art.

English: Herbert A. Giles (1889), Chuang Tzŭ: Mystic, Moralist, and Social Reformer (1889) — public domain. Chinese: Guo Xiang recension from Chinese Wikisource.

Character glossary

Similar passages

Data: English Wikisource (Public domain texts; transcription CC BY-SA 4.0); Chinese Wikisource (Public domain texts; transcription CC BY-SA 4.0). Retrieved 2026-10-22.